Search:  Search
    Home Subscriptions Current issue Back issues About TAE Internships Advertising Write us    
Home > Back issues > Diversity > Print This E-mail This
July/August 2006 cover 120

Table of Content
Subscribe

 
If You Think We Have Problems...
By Jane Mack-Cozzo

After more than 12 years of living and teaching in Japan, I'm still amazed at the plethora of myths and clichés surrounding Japanese culture. Perhaps the most egregiously false of these perceptions is that of Japan's "superior" educational system.

The Japanese educational system does, indeed, work differently from those in the West. That Japanese elementary and high school students are assigned hours of daily homework and sent to juku (cram schools), is well known among educated Westerners. It's also well known that so-called kyoiku mamas ("education mamas"), ambitious for their children, have them enrolled in pre-kindergarten cram schools almost as soon as they're born. These schools cost nearly $750 a month for two days a week. Over a quarter of pre-schoolers attend such cram schools in order to be admitted to a prestigious kindergarten. From there, in the "escalator system," pupils are virtually assured admission to primary, middle, and high school. This, in turn, facilitates acceptance at a corresponding university.

All this effort is expended in preparation for the vaunted and near-sacred university entrance examination, the successful completion of which will determine the course of these young people's lives. "Examination hell," as it is known in Japan, is considered a small price to pay for admission to a national university such as Todai (Tokyo University) or one of the roku dai (Six Best) private universities in the country.

The ritual associated with these exams is treated with an almost religious solemnity. During my years of teaching at Japanese universities, I was able to witness this annual event firsthand. It's different from the way we do things, but it isn't better. 

Consider, for starters, the English language exams. Selected members of examination committees are charged with writing the all-important English language questions. Quite literally, hours are spent analyzing everything from usage to punctuation. We gaijin (foreigners) are asked to serve on these committees, ostensibly for native speaker input.

Yet we native speakers find ourselves in a verbal tug-of-war with Japanese sensei (professors), who insist that our usage is incorrect. These same professors, however, don't even conduct their upper-level classes in English. One listening-comprehension question concerned the town of Carmel, California. I corrected the town's pronunciation from the accent on the first syllable to the accent on the second, but this carried no weight, even though I am a native Californian. The professors' Japanese dictionary stated that the first usage was correct.

All of this pointless pedantry results in students memorizing grammatical rules but failing to acquire speaking proficiency. Those who are admitted to a university have already had six years of English, but can hardly speak a word because their study of the language is oriented to passing the grammar and reading-comprehension questions on the entrance exams. Indeed, Japanese scores on the international TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) exam are among the lowest in the world.

Katagana, the system of characters the Japanese use for foreign words, also holds students back. Because katagana conforms to the constrictions of Japanese pronunciation, English words are consistently mispronounced. Years ago, a student mentioned she had seen the American film "Buru Berubeto." After many requests to repeat the title, I deduced she was talking about the film Blue Velvet. (Katagana changes V to B and L to R.)

Once students gain admission to university, virtually all learning and study cease. What passes for education would be a source of embarrassment to almost any other university system in the world. My colleagues have had students who attend perhaps two classes during the entire school year and then show up for the final exam thinking that if they are allowed to take it, they will automatically pass the course--knowing full well that attendance was mandatory. A favorite explanation is "if I don't pass this course, I can't graduate." The administration will often back the student and simply override the failing grade.

The students who do attend class exhibit behavior befitting youngsters half their age. Boys and girls studiously avoid sitting next to each other, giggling when they are asked to do so. Every time this happened, we gaijin were immediately reminded of our own behavior--when we were in the second grade. Their disengagement from learning is so fundamental that they often pack themselves in the farthest back seats of the classroom, so they can gossip, sleep, or use cell phones undisturbed.

Most Japanese sensei tolerate such behavior, sitting at the desk in the front of the classroom and burying their heads in the textbook from which they read. They rarely get up, even to write on the blackboard. They are poorly prepared for their classes and rarely comment on student papers.

Many students routinely neglect to bring either textbooks or writing materials to class, and a request to write anything at all will send them scrambling to borrow pencils and paper from the few students who have them. Homework is completed only under threat of a failing grade or a worse consequence, because it interferes with the all-important social-club activities. Cheating is not an unusual occurrence and is expected to be excused by an "I'm sorry" (as is almost every other infraction in Japanese society).

Weekly classes are officially 90 minutes long, but seldom last more than 70 minutes. When I first started teaching at a Japanese university, I wasn't aware of this "tradition," and I asked one of the professors if, as a new foreign instructor, I shouldn't teach the entire 90 minutes.

"Oh, no, sensei. That simply isn't done. If you do, it'll just cause resentment."

Later, when I had planned to go to Hong Kong during the December break, I discovered that the proposed departure date conflicted with the last class. I mentioned this to one of my Japanese colleagues, and he chastised me for giving it a second thought. "Of course, you should simply cancel your classes on that day."

"But isn't that a bit irregular?" I asked.

"No, sensei, don't worry. Besides, the students expect it. In fact, you should have at least two kyuko (cancellations) a semester. That's normal."

At one school where I taught, the chairman of the English department organized a summer course at a sister school in Tennessee for his students. He explained to me how he would motivate his students: "I'll let the girls who speak English hold the teddy bear." One Japanese psychology professor rationalized this arrested development by stating that "college students make good use of the prolonged adolescence while enjoying campus life." He viewed universities as a kind of "moratorium" playing a major role in helping students restructure their lives. In other words, the childishness which is so endemic in the society as a whole (Douglas MacArthur called Japan a "nation of 12-year-olds"), is reinforced perhaps because the rest of these students' lives is so asphyxiatingly programmed.

At the same time, creative original thinking is actively discouraged, for it goes against the wa ("harmony"). An oft-quoted Japanese saying that "the nail that stands up must be hammered down" reflects the all-pervasive conformity of the society. Small wonder that Japan, despite having a massive, technologically advanced economy, has produced only eight Nobel Prize winners. Many of them left the country to do their research.

Donald Ritchie, a well-known expert on Japanese culture, once remarked that the Japanese lack a sense of inner struggle, of irony, of dialectic, of contradiction--all qualities that are vigorously repressed. Those few individuals who dare to "make themselves visible" are shunned. It comes as no surprise that many observers view Japanese students as not only naive but vapid. Yet for the most part, these students remain cooperative and congenial, and in today's world, that goes a long way toward redeeming them.

Jane Barnes Mack-Cozzo was a professor of American Studies and English at Japanese universities for over 12 years. She now divides her time between California and Germany.




Also in this issue
Time to Fight Back
By Kenneth Lee
The Big Snooze
By Naomi Schaefer, Brandon Bosworth, Mark Pulliam
The Twisted Academy
By Arthur Waldron, Hillel Fradkin
Vulnerable Under God
By Naomi Schaefer
Great Expectations
By James Forman